hate is alive and well

some of you may have read my recent post about the “racist” pastor in the rural texas town where I live. I recently became aware of a new policy issued by the Fort Worth police chief designed to discourage bias by his police officers.

In the increasingly swelling comment stream (which i finally had to stop reading), someone actually commented that he thought all officers already knew to treat all people equally. (The commenter had a point. Officers’ code of ethics requires: “I will never act officiously or permit personal feelings, prejudices, animosities or friendships to influence my decisions.” but is anyone without some type of bias and moreover–can everyone keep it in check?)

“Where has this person been living,” I wondered.

I can’t imagine there being anyone who hasn’t personally experienced biased treatment or not knowing someone who’s been the victim of it, particularly here in the South.

are we (white) people really all that naïve?

the 2004 movie “Crash” was not merely an allegory. it was and still is real. the prejudicial attitudes portrayed by the characters in this movie are visible and extend beyond the tired cliché of a long-haired teenager being harassed because he’s out late at night and probably up to no good or of someone being pulled over for “DWB.”

people are lying to themselves if they think that biased treatment doesn’t occur every moment of every day—and not just by those involved in upholding the law.

those who are poor are still looked down on because they cannot afford the upkeep on their vehicles or afford the insurance that so many of us who can afford have. people of color are still looked down upon or viewed with suspicion. and don’t even get me started on how people are bullied for being  effeminate, gay, handicapped, and so on.

so as i read the policy, I can’t imagine anyone balking at a simple policy that mandates fair and equal treatment to all.

“…the order prohibits police employees from considering “race, color, gender, age, national origin, religion, disability, economic status, sexual orientation, gender expression, gender identity, transgender status, membership in a cultural group or other individual characteristics or distinctions” while performing police duty.”

people who posted hateful and derogatory comments attempt to distract from the issue by decrying the policy’s proponet’s political motivations, desire for publicity, and—heaven forbid—shrieking about it being nothing more than a ploy to advance the cause of people who do not identify as heterosexual.

further, they squawk about the policy being abused by those who would feign violation of rights by police. but as they squawk, they fail to consider how vitally precious their own rights would be if they found themselves in the same situation. forget that the poor and the underpriviledged or people of color or non-heterosexuals  have just as much right to fairness and equal treatment as any other human being.

so I’ll plainly ask: do we need such policies?

apparently we do.

America is a grand and wonderful place to live. however, Americans are not above reproach when it comes to how it has treated people. we can go back to the time of the Native Americans and how the white man stole the land from them. we can discuss how we enslaved peoples of color—Chinese and African— and built this country on their backs. we can talk about how we failed to recognize the equal rights of women until year and equal rights of all men and women regardless  of color until controversial legislation —opposed by majorities of white “Christians” (quotes purposeful)—was finally forced through less than 50 years ago. we even had to have legislation to require that places and opportunities were made equitable for people whose physical capabilities limited them. (and while i’m at it, may i take a moment to compliment those brave men and women (and add “mostly white men”) who had the courage to push this type of legislation through! oh that our leaders today would show the same mettle!)

news and history is rife with abuses by those in power–long before we Americans wielded the weapon of majority and religious persecution.

don’t tell me we don’t need a policy like that.

and don’t tell me that mere political motivation is the only reason for coming forward publicly with such a policy.

the simple truth is that those of us who find ourselves in minorities require protection from a majority who tromps around on the rights of those minorities, wielding a Bible or the law or their own ignorance, bullying those who are not like them.

i hope that as time passes, we will have less need for such policies as a response to hate.

(“Fort Worth Star-Telegram’s” follow-up editorial here.)

3 thoughts on “hate is alive and well

  1. “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.” 24 words only slightly modified from the original Equal Rights Amendment written by Alice Long in 1923 shortly after the 19th Amendment was passed allowing women to vote. Yet it raised such an uproar when reintroduced during the women’s movement in 1972 that it was swept under the rug. Again. And women still aren’t paid or treated equally on the job in many places. So, yes, unfortunately these things have to be said and acted on. It probably wouldn’t change attitudes any more than the Fort Worth police chief’s words…………but eventually, at least for some, where the head goes the heart will follow.

    • ahhhhh my friends are SO smart (not to mention attractive and stylish!)

      thanks for such an insightful comment from your own particular point-of-view.

  2. Todd… I am losing my mind! How bout this policy: If it
    quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, it’s a duck… and if it
    talks like a human and walks like a human, it’s a human… treat the
    duck like a duck… and treat the human like a human!!!
    We humans are ALL mutts, by race, gender and
    Take one look at me at you will think
    “average white chunky chick”. Take one look at my hubby and you
    will think “average white guy in a wheelchair”. Our heritages are
    soooo much more deep than that. Everything that came to make us
    average was or is currently a prejudicial victim.
    Me: Cherokee, which could be any
    combination from purebred to Chinese rail worker to escaped African
    slave to kidnapped Mexican or white kid; Comanche, more of the
    same, German, original English, and countless others.
    Hubby: Cherokee, definitely had to be
    an escaped African slave in there (becuz of his CURLS, clears
    throat!!), Micmac, Spanish, Dutch, French, and whatever comprises
    merchant sailors from Nova Scotia, handicapped. Hell, if one of us
    were gay, regendered or tranny, we would have it all covered! We
    walk through life without a single label applied that truly limits
    our world (except the label of mild insanity given our current
    penchant for adopting orphaned goats). I stand by my
    statement that sexual-based discrimination is the modern day
    “acceptable” racism.
    We have to talk, raise our
    children, and CONSTANTLY challenge the world on this injustice… and
    we have to remember that we catch many more flies with honey that
    we do with vinegar… I want to go screaming into the streets
    smacking people and shooting the idiots… but the bubbly backhand
    wins every single time. The application of the bubbly backhand
    takes so much more intelligence and finesse than a baseball bat to
    the head… it’s an artform! And heaven knows that it’s the fairer
    sex that can best apply an artform – but I’ll leave it up to you
    what comprises “the fairer sex”. Much love

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s